ext_225765 ([identity profile] kirabug.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] packbat 2007-05-07 10:45 pm (UTC)

My first reaction is that I don't buy it. First, blood darkens pretty darn quick, so to get that shade of red the blood would have to be close to still-wet. I don't know any artists willing to risk their scanner glass with a smear of something as difficult to remove as blood. Granted, watercolor paper holds color really well, but, well, just seems suspicious to me.

Second, it must've been one hell of a smash 'cause that would've taken a lot of blood to actually spread with a brush and not have it all coagulate on the brush.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org