ext_45296 ([identity profile] packbat.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] packbat 2007-12-23 01:13 pm (UTC)

The ellipsis is critical here. 0.999... ≠ 0.999, because the former decimal is nonterminating.

Look again at the one-third proof. I've numbered the lines this time.

[1] 1/3 = 10/30
[2]     = 9/30 + 1/30
[3]     = 9/3 * 1/10 + 1/3 * 1/10
[4]     = 3 * 1/10 + 1/3 * 1/10
[5]     = 3 * 1/10 + 3 * 1/10 * 1/10 + 1/3 * 1/10 * 1/10
[6]     = 3 * 1/10 + 3 * 1/102 + 3 * 1/103 + ...
[7]     = .3 + .03 + .003 + ...
[8]     = .333...


What you are pointing out is essentially what is stated on [4]: that if you terminate the decimal at any point, you need a 1/3 * 1/10-n to represent the remaining part of the fraction. However, the notation does not represent the termination of the decimal at any point - rather, the decimal never terminates. The roundoff error you point out never comes. Instead, you get the infinite series (copied from Sam Hughe's page (http://qntm.org/?pointnine)):

0.9999... = 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + 0.0009 + ...

            n=∞
          =  Σ 0.9 * 0.1n
            n=0

            n=∞
          =  Σ a * rn where a=0.9 and r=0.1
            n=0

          = a / (1-r)
          = 0.9 / (1-0.1)
          = 0.9 / 0.9
          = 1


If you require that all decimals terminate, 0.999... is not a decimal.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org