Someone wrote in [personal profile] packbat 2007-12-16 06:58 am (UTC)

Re: lol

* Gold standard: To some extent, it's common sense - if the government is required to have a large stockpile of gold on hand, then the supply of gold for industrial purposes (e.g. corrosion-resistant electrical contacts) will be greatly decreased, increasing prices. Not to mention that the government has to come up with the gold somehow. A quick Googling turned up this analysis from an actual economist - which is less about impracticality with simple improbability.

Look, I'm not going to sit here and argue that the gold standard is the end all be all solution to economic problems but lets face it, the current system is a disaster that has put the US in trillions of dollars of debt to foreign countries on money loaned through a secretive organization who has no accountability to the american people... that's a disaster.

* Income taxes: Of the $2.4 trillion the U.S. government received in 2006, $1 trillion came from personal income taxes. That's an absurd amount of money to cut from the budget - so large that I am unable to believe it could be practicably done.

Well, it could be done in Ron Paul's plan, whether you agree with it or not, bringing the troops home from everywhere across the world and cutting many of the worthless federal agencies would save that kind of money with ease

* Racism: In deference to the weakness of my case, I'll drop the argument.

* Undermining modern medicine: Supporting alternative medicine and eliminating mandatory vaccinations both do this. Unapproved treatments are often bogus. And while our health care system is broken, the fix is not by encouraging the use of unproven medical treatments, but by - I hate to say it - universal health care.

All I'll say to this is once you realize the FDA isn't there to serve the greater good for the American people you will realize why Paul's plan makes sense. The current system doesn't protect anybody from ineffective treatments or harmful treatments, it's a race to who can bribe the FDA fast enough to get an approval so they can rape the American public with crushing drug prices. If you love socialized health care so much you should do some research into how medicine is handled in socialized countries - they do just fine without bureaucracy managing their medicine to the extent that the FDA does.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org