February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, November 9th, 2006 06:46 pm (UTC)
You realize that, depending on how one interprets this, evolution might have never originally been brought into classrooms at at all? It wasn't until it started getting taught at at least the university level that it started to spread beyond a fairly small group of naturalists...

Oh, good call. And sometimes in education it's necessary to simplify the truth, teach the common special cases (e.g. Newtonian mechanics). I guess there should be a sliding scale, then – in elementary/primary school, teach simplified but accepted truth, and as one advances towards and through college, when the students are better equipped to understand and question what is being taught, introduce advanced and controversial material. I guess most sciences are taught this way already.

A. to make claims about what is true and what is not [is free speech]
B. to slander someone [isn't]

A does not include B?


A includes B, but the special rule of B supersedes the rule of A. B – slander – doesn't include statements like "[livejournal.com profile] noneuklid is a nimrod"; it's restricted to statements like "[livejournal.com profile] noneuklid is a rapist", which can do major harm. (In some precincts, you could even get onto the sex offenders lists from no more than an unfounded accusation!)

Reply

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org