Friday, October 16th, 2026 10:56 pm

The first thing I tried to do once we got our suitcase was go to the toilet.

D found me a disabled one with a weird door: it slid open when you pressed a button (like the ones I'm used to on trains). But when I walked in, the door didn't close! There was no similar button. Nor could I see any other way to activate it. It was a pocket door, it'd disappeared entirely so there was no way to pull it closed or interact with it.

I just stood there in this open room, feeling like there were cartoon question marks above my head.

A nice lady happening by (this door was opposite the entrance to the ladies') helped me out. First she asked me something that I didn't understand of course, which made me feel even more helpless. Then she said "You want to close?" Yes! Why could I remember the word for open right now and not close??

She pointed out a weird switch, like a German light switch which I find confusing anyway...

I pressed it, a red light came on but the door didn't move. I reset it, tried again, said something stupid and obvious like "It doesn't work," she came in and tried it, she went outside and tried the button that is there right under the perfectly functioning one I'd used to open the door. I was a little worried about that one because I didn't want to be stuck in there if I couldn't operate the door from the inside! But it didn't matter because nothing happened. Nothing continued to happen.

"This is Germany," she said to me finally, in an inscrutable tone of voice. And we went our separate ways.

(I had to use the regular men's room, which stank of stale piss even through my Flo mask, had tiny indicators on the cubicle doors of whether they were vacant or occupied that I had to just push on all the doors anyway, and was as quiet as the grave despite how crowded it was, because no one washed their hands apparently.)

In the next half hour or so, D had to carry our suitcase up a non-working escalator, the transport app didn't have signal in the station so we couldn't use it, the correct train we eventually got on was 15 minutes late, and it was almost impossible to both find and then open the door to the apartment that we've booked.

We finally got in but after a very cursory look at the place because it was almost 9pm, we got some food from a nearby Greek takeaway, walked around a little to see what's nearby, and had a drink outside a bar. D called my gin-based cocktail a Gin & Teutonic.

We're here! We've got plans to see friends of mine from the internet the next few days, before my pre-op appointment Tuesday. Turns out I know a few people who live in the vicinity of Düsseldorf.

Friday, October 16th, 2026 02:09 pm
in june, i went to berlin for 2 weeks. this is a compilation of posts and such about what happened there.

( Read more... )
Tags:
Thursday, October 15th, 2026 10:50 pm

I'm in this uncomfortable liminal place now: done with work (feeling good about how I wrapped things up! which no doubt is hubris over something I've forgotten but never mind, it feels good for now), trying to pack.

I've packed for lots of vacations and I've packed for hospital stays, but I've never had to pack for both at once.

And especially when I don't know what if anything I will be able to hold or carry or manage on the way back. That isn't something I'm used to. So we've only paid for one checked bag (on our budget airline we've never heard of, I'm amazed we're even being seated together without having to pay extra for that) because D will have to be responsible for it all on the return trip.

I think I've got my stuff all packed, and my tummy is playing up, no doubt due to the stress and the relative lateness; 11pm is past my bedtime.

We leave about lunchtime tomorrow, so there's time for a little bit of sleeping in and also all the last-minute flailing.

Now I just need my stomach to stop hurting so I can sleep!

Thursday, October 15th, 2026 01:40 pm
i'm rereading fahrenheit 451 in one day for my book club tomorrow. this is my first time re-reading it since high school. bradbury’s writing is still really good, but i am catching some political implications i don’t like. the lecture from the chief firefighter about how books ended up going away begins with a thing about “black people found little black sambo offensive so we had to burn it.” there are other examples afterwards, but like, it’s the first one. it doesn’t really make the whole “it’s just too easy to offend people with books” argument go down very well. my copy of the book has lots of critical essays as well as essays by bradbury himself at the end of the book. and oh my god ray you are not helping yourself out here.
"Fire Captain Beatty, in my novel Fahrenheit 451, described how the books were burned first by minorities, each ripping a page or a paragraph from this book, then that, until the day came when the books were empty and the minds shut and the libraries closed forever."
type of guy who was faced by (and clearly disturbed by) mccarthyism and yet somehow decided minority groups posed the realest danger of censorship. this quote was from a much later essay, and bradbury definitely got more openly conservative with age, but this was very much in the original text too even if he decided to really spell it out in this essay. it's not the anti-communist witch hunters who started burning the books in this book's world, it was Offended Black People. i always see stuff like mccarthyism and repression in the USSR listed as the major inspirations for this novel, but i feel a little like... were they actually though? when the novel text and later bradbury himself were saying it was about this instead?

this book also isn’t good about women, but i feel like it could have so easily been better, which makes it even more annoying to me.

clarisse really is the only positive female character. she’s a little manic pixie dream girl long before that trope existed, but i also think she’s interesting to read about and a nice presence in the narrative, and it would have been nice if she had stuck around for more of it. but of course bradbury kills her off very early, leaving montag to turn to faber instead as his only friend in his journey.

then there’s montag’s wife millie, who is introduced very dramatically, on the verge of death after attempting suicide. but by the next scene she doesn’t remember her attempt and denies it, which really feels like a cop-out. for the rest of the book millie is really vacuous, only caring about TV, and is ultimately the one who turns montag in, crying only about the loss of her precious TVs the last time we see her. we start with a sign she has some deep internal discontent and then we just never see that again. the same goes with millie’s friends, who are portrayed as chattering ditzes who don’t care about anything until montag reading dover beach causes one of them to start sobbing. so, a sign that she also has repressed feelings of sadness- which is again never followed up on. it’s a shame because i love the idea that even these women who seem like they slot perfectly into the expectations of this society are also quietly suffering in ways they don’t entirely realize or understand. but i don’t think bradbury cared enough about the interiority of women to explore that. ultimately they stay ditzes, just a sign of the sickness of this society, barely even worth mourning.

there’s still a lot thought-provoking here. at one point faber says to montag that what he’s looking for in his life isn’t actually in books, the books might just help him find it. i think this book often just gets painted as “the book about how books are important,” but that’s really oversimplifying it. it feels to me now like it’s arguing for being present and connecting with other people even more than just reading- very much the same kinds of things that the folks yelling about getting off social media these days like to talk about.

bradbury was a very good writer but also someone who acted like a crotchety old man even as a young man. and a lot of his scifi writing was basically inspired by his own weird pet peeves (a major inspiration for this book was just his horror at seeing a random woman wearing headphones and listening to a portable radio in public). if he developed things into a more universal direction, it almost feels like it was more by accident than by design. somehow writing something that gets lauded as like The Book About How Reading Is Important when he meant to write about, like, Political Correctness Is Out Of Control, and tv and radio are so annoying, and no one walks anywhere anymore.
Tags:
Thursday, October 15th, 2026 01:04 pm

i absolutely hate it when people say they don’t know how to discover new music without something like the spotify algorithm. i know it’s not polite to say “skill issue” but i absolutely feel it when i hear this. people managed to find new music before spotify. you still have the wonders of the internet at your fingertips. i promise you can do it.

sometimes i feel like, as someone who was already a music nerd before spotify existed, i’m carrying the fucking Ancient Lore for zoomers who are trying to quit spotify and jump on the physical media trend.

that’s not fair, though, because it’s not just zoomers! i’ve also heard this from people my age, that they don't know how they would find new music if they left spotify. it kinda reminds me of the "deskilling" people talk about with AI- like by relying on the spotify continuous algomix to deliver them new songs they might like, they’ve forgotten how to do whatever they did before to find music. it’s so weird.

in care you need ideas on how to find new music without spotify, here are some things i like:

  • ask a friend for a rec!! see what they've been liking!! we can be each other's algorithms!
  • look up a band or musician you already like on wikipedia and investigate any scenes they're a part of, music they list as influences, or music that was influenced by them
  • rateyourmusic's community is kind of a cesspit but it can still be a good place to poke around and find new music. you can check out their pages for genres, and they now have some music tagged by "scene" too. (ps i have a rym page)
  • listen to the radio! i especially love college radio and independent radio stations. but really, if you've been in a bubble of the same music, most radio can get you out of your comfort zone! some independent stations i have heard good things about are kexp, wfmu, and nts. also, i love radio.garden, it's a really cool website that lets you listen to radio stations from around the world! i believe it's geo-blocked in some locations like the uk though.
  • if you have access to a record store, literally just pick something to listen to by the album cover. no research just vibes. can be a cool way to try something totally new
  • this is probably the most unhinged rec i have. but there are people who upload full episodes of old MTV shows like 120 minutes and yo! mtv raps onto youtube. I Am Just Saying.

hope this helps! if you feel attached to the spotify algorithm i promise you can live without it! i'm not anti-music-streaming, i personally pay for apple music and it feels worth it to me. but spotify is a really terrible company!! you can do better!!
Tags:
Wednesday, October 14th, 2026 11:22 pm

I had such a ridiculously busy day today.

I started with knocking over a plant next to my desk so the time I intended to spend on making coffee and breakfast I instead spent trying to sweep up the dirt, grit, and actual rocks (for drainage) and getting them back into the pot -- luckily the plant, a big old yucca, is fine. But the floor was gritty under my shoes and my chair wheels for the whole day and I didn't have time to do anything about it.

Because, after a brief team meeting finalizing the details, my team went into a big Teams meeting where we were showcasing policy to our whole directorate (which is over a hundred people, though they didn't all turn up of course).

It's a big deal ( work stuff )

until at 12:30 he said "anyway, enough, we need lunch!"

I'd not long since eaten my breakfast!

I did take advantage of a chance to just stare into space and play on my phone a little though, which was soon interrupted by ( surgery logistics [brief mention of weight] )

So it was nice to get that out of the way! Handily I'd been sitting right near D's laptop when the call came, so he could not only look up how much I weighed but make notes while I talked on speakerphone. But my goodness, how exhausting.

I really did go and have some lunch after that.

And before too long it was time to start getting ready to go out to an in-person meeting this afternoon, just in town again. I was tagging along with a colleague to a pan-disability forum which like all the other ones I've been part of lately was accommodating of the loudest and most demonstrative people's access needs, so I had to sit in the dark which was especially hard on my eyes considering how bad they've been lately (I don't know if the stress is "going to my eyes," the way my mom used to say colds did when I was little, or if it's just a coincidence but my god has my nystagmus been flaring lately), and usually more than one person was talking at the same time so I stayed quiet. Luckily the person who said green light was the worst color for them and blue was best was sitting across from someone who was the opposite, so I didn't have to try so hard to make my There Is No Correct Color to Make Everything point quite as strongly as I usually do as they'd already done that for me.

This evening I've started packing the things I won't need beforehand into the one suitcase we get to check. And I've made a list of the other stuff. Because we fly to Düsseldorf the day after tomorrow! Wild.

Wednesday, October 14th, 2026 03:47 pm

i really do think sometimes that i would like to do medical provider education. give practicing medical providers (especially PCPs!) trainings about stigmatizing language about STIs and sexual health, diagnostic overshadowing, transphobia, fatphobia, those kinds of things.

in my line of work, doctors and clinicians being ignorant and stigmatizing towards their patients just feels like such an enormous issue that i keep running into over and over. and it’s infuriating. you can go to the ends of the earth trying to educate someone about prep and get them to consider starting prep for themselves, but if they go to their provider and they say “what’s prep?" and expect the patient to educate them, or worse yet if they say “why do you need something like that? you're not doing things that are Risky, right?” then you’ve just lost them forever. and worst of all is the provider just completely shutting the person down and saying "no, you don't need that" because they don't match the picture in the provider's head of who needs prep (often white MSM).

i also encounter so many prep providers who are way too comfy misgendering their trans patients to me. i hope to god they aren’t also doing that to the patient’s face. but i also think that there’s an element of “well, since i’m not talking directly to this person it doesn’t matter, i don’t have to make that effort to use their preferred pronouns.” and that fucking sucks too!! it’s like a “well i’ll just humor them” kind of attitude towards trans people. it goes without saying that that also drives people away. one time i heard of a situation from a provider where a patient had been missing appointments and not responding to contact, only to discover after doing some digging myself that this patient was trans and the provider had at no point been using their correct name or pronouns with me. like, wow, no wonder why this person doesn't want to come back for an appointment.

diagnostic overshadowing and fatphobia are just things i've encountered in my own life. i don't wanna go too into detail about it but i've received some absolute dogshit medical care because for every issue i have, there are two really easy explanations sitting right there for doctors that require no further work- "it's just your anxiety" and "it's because you need to lose weight." it sucks so much.

but yeah. doctors themselves create a lot of barriers to medical care for their patients, and i would love to know how we are working on addressing that and if i can help one day.
Wednesday, October 14th, 2026 12:29 am
(This post will use the terms Harriet Wilson used for herself and her work, which are no longer appropriate in the present day. Nevertheless, they are her words, and since I'm quoting her, I'm going to use her words as they are.)

Harriet E. Wilson, sometimes written as Hattie E. Wilson and H. E. Wilson, was the first published black author in the States, with her 1859 novel, Our Nig (which I haven't been able to read yet). She was of African-American, Irish-American, and Native American ancestry, and by 1867/5/25, she was a Spiritualist trance medium, which I only found out thanks to Kevin Young when I was refreshing my memory digging through his book Bunk: The Rise of Hoaxes, Humbug, Plagiarists, Phonies, Post-Facts, and Fake News for Cross-Ethnic Headmates II.

Naturally, I was deeply fascinated. The stereotype of the Spiritualist medium is overwhelmingly white women, but Wilson was apparently a trance medium for twenty years! That's usually a pretty multi thing! Did any records of her medium work survive? Are any of her words written down?

So I decided to do the drudge work of digging through the (many, many) back-issues of The Banner of Light trying to scrape every piece of data I could find on the lady. ( Read more... )
Tuesday, October 13th, 2026 08:58 pm

it seems like "going analog" and "analog living" and stuff like that has become kind of a buzzy trend.

i dunno. i totally appreciate feeling like you need to get away from garbage social media. but personally, i think the internet improves and has improved my life immensely. i would not have had half the amount of exposure i've had to different kinds of people and art and ideas without it. so i find all this "live offline! log off!" backlash all of a sudden a little bit annoying. also, also a good amount of this feels like buying things in an attempt to fix yourself. buying a journal won’t actually make you start journaling. buying a bunch of DVDs and a DVD player won’t make you actually watch them. etc

(also, can we talk for a second about how offline and analog aren't the same thing? a digital camera isn't analog. CDs and DVDs aren't analog. that's just me being pedantic though.)

personally, i feel like if you're trying to spend less time scrolling on your phone or whatever, it's best to target the specific things that are making you unhappy rather than deciding you need to go entirely offline. i'm just saying that i'm seeing a whole lot of "i'm going to try journaling and knitting instead of scrolling!" and not a whole lot of "i'm deleting my tiktok/instagram/twitter/whatever account because i feel like it's making my life worse." also, i think you can't just remove an activity from your life without replacing it with something with a similar purpose. maybe sometimes you really do have the energy to do a more brain-intensive hobby like crafting or reading instead of scrolling. but what if you're just turning to scrolling to rest and chill? can you find a different restful activity? 

my only hope is that maybe this trend will make less people look at me like i have three heads when i say i don't use instagram or tiktok anymore.

Tuesday, October 13th, 2026 09:21 am

My boss's screenreader includes a voice from Snoop Dogg, so that's who's reading us this policy position statement about the cost of living in the team meeting this morning.

Tags:
Tuesday, October 13th, 2026 08:16 am
Rogan: We started writing stories in a “serious” manner in 2000. We made our first comic, MPD for You and Me in 2007.

( Artistic self-actualization is being able to read your own shit for fun. )
Monday, October 12th, 2026 10:56 pm
during a book club meeting, one of my college friends said something about how she still regularly uses an idea she first heard from me. it’s the idea of a “to done” list- listing out the things you accomplished that day even if they weren’t necessarily on your to do list. she was like “it really helps me realize i have been productive even when i feel like i’m not.” i was fucking stunned by this, both that something i don't even remember saying was so impactful for her and also that it was specifically about making a to do list, something i am really really bad at and don't always find useful.

i definitely think it’s the kind of idea that would appeal to someone who was really struggling, which is probably why i was talking about it. thinking about where i was at in college- that was a point when, having been removed from a traumatic situation for the first time maybe ever, all my issues started manifesting at once. then post-college i was placed back into the bad situation. yikes. in this post-college time, as i was trying to get a job and build something of an "adult life" for myself while back with my parents, i went through a period where i felt like i was just innately less productive overall than other people. like, i think i went onto reddit at one point (i used to use reddit regularly ugh) and asked something like “about how many things do normal people get done in a day?” so… i can absolutely remember the context in which that idea existed for me.

my friend was always a very organized, busy, type A kind of person, especially in college. in recent years, i think she’s finally relaxed a little, which is good because god damn, take a break sometimes lol. but it’s interesting that this idea has been useful to her at stressful points. back in college, i don’t think i would have ever thought she’d need something like this. clearly she was someone who always had a meticulous to do list and was regularly checking off the items on it, so why would she bother? i guess it’s interesting to feel like even in my own mess i was demonstrating something to this very put-together person that she found new and useful.

i also remember her saying one time (more recently, although not that recently) that she envied my ability to just chill because she feels like she's often trying to do too much. so i guess that same relationship has continued. honestly, i can sometimes feel pretty insecure comparing what my life looks like to the stuff she's accomplished. but she sees qualities worth envying in me too (although they're not accomplishments lol). and like i said, i do think it seems like she has succeeded in chilling out over the past few years, so it is a lesson she's been actively trying to learn.
Tags:
Monday, October 12th, 2026 06:55 pm

allegedly my first word was “brick." my parents house has a brick fireplace, and according to my parents, i touched one of the bricks and said “brick.” as i learned more about linguistics, i came to realize that was a deeply weird first word if it's true. a lot of kids first words are names for family members (i.e., mama, dada, a pet's name) or maybe other common everyday words (a toy, a food, hi, bye-bye). "brick" is... not any of those things. also, that fucking consonant cluster (“br”) is unexpected for a first word from a small child.

now that i think about it, i wonder a little if i had some degree of weirdness in how i acquired speech that just didn’t register as unusual to my parents. i mean, i already know that due to the autism i had a lot of other weird shit going on, like hyperlexia and something that’s like echolalia but not exactly.

the thing that i do is called palilalia. excellent word btw. it's technically different from echolalia. it means that i repeat things that i just said rather than things that other people say, typically in a whisper. this usually happens instantly, i’ll finish a sentence and then right away repeat the last few words. wikipedia says it's a complex tic. idk

this was a lot more noticeable when i was a kid, and people did notice it. a tv character on the tv show "the middle" did this for some reason and my parents were like "it's like you!" i learned to suppress it quite hard with time because of how weird people find it. now i find it’s mostly noticeable if i say something and then laugh- if you pay attention you might notice me kind of repeating the last few words i said in the laugh.

 

Monday, October 12th, 2026 06:28 pm

i finished parable of the sower. is it a hot, controversial take to say i had some mixed feelings?

i love lauren as a character, but i find the story's view of the future deeply depressing, honestly. i seem to remember people talking about this book as being hopeful and inspiring. lauren and her earthseed community are, i’m sure, where that comes from. but overall, i’m like… did we read the same book? lauren and her community survive. they make it, at least for now. but god, every general thing that happens in this book is just awful.

i think the thing i take most issue with is the idea that seemingly most people in society have become totally violent and uncaring. the world of this book is one where people are waiting to pounce on you at every corner- to steal your stuff, torture you, rape you, kill you, and maybe even eat you once you’re dead. it's a “kill or be killed” world for sure. that feels like a very dim view on humanity, to me. i did enjoy that lauren became less suspicious and more willing to accept others into her group with time- i would have liked to see a little bit more exploration of that thought that maybe, even in this world, some people can still be better than you think, and how she came to that belief. maybe then i would have found the story less bleak. i realized later that this book was written at a time (1993) when drugs and violent crime were big societal panics and i feel like you can really, really feel that. the pyro addicts pretty much just exist as violent antagonists to torment our characters and be killed guilt-free. there's that one part where someone says something about how "they just do what everyone else secretly wants to," but that's not really explored further.

i wish the second half of the book had been longer. it feels a lot more compressed than the first half. i guess this relates to the thing where i want lauren getting less suspicious and more accepting to be more explored.

i thought the community dynamics of the enclave lauren grows up in in the first half of the book were depicted really well and were very believable. i really enjoyed that part of the book. but i feel like we saw a lot less of those interpersonal dynamics discussed among the people she picks up for her own community. we get their traumatic backstories, but i feel like we don’t hear a whole lot about how they bounce off each other. and it’s a shame because i feel like things started off well with exploring the relationships forming between lauren, harry, and zahra (i really like zahra). but then we kind of gloss over the relationships among most of the new people after that (except for that one guy who was suspicious, mora, i guess). like, what is emery like as a character? what does she think of, idk, allie? couldn’t tell you. i guess the introductions of these characters may just be setup for the sequel, but they really couldn't get any more space here?

also, i do find it annoying that lauren eventually falls in love with a 57-year-old man who also happens to own land which is where the community settles. i kind of would have liked it better if they had found a good place to settle on their own- after all, considering the broken down social structures of this world, i don’t think him legally owning the land will even matter to anyone anyway. i’m not going to linger on the 57 year old and the 18 year old talking about getting married. it’s weird that butler decided to put this in her book. but also, in this book’s chaotic lawless world, i felt like i could go “okay whatever i guess” about it.

there's also something that bothers me about the ending. the violent end of lauren’s community that she grew up in is teaches her (and us) the lesson that hiding in an isolated community from the chaos and violence of this world is not possible, that it’s only a matter of time before places like that get broken down and destroyed. the thesis seems to be that you need to go out into the world instead. and yet at the end of the book she’s forming her own new isolated community. to me, that undermines the idea that this is a happy ending, because the first part of the book makes it clear this will not last and will not keep them safe- and, from what i've seen about the second book, that’s a correct assumption, it does not. but apparently it takes it happening again for her to Really Learn.

i want to be clear that i did like this book, and i think these complaints i have are pretty minor in the scheme of things. but yeah.

Tags:
Monday, October 12th, 2026 06:12 pm
Submitted by [personal profile] quailfence! Thank you, [personal profile] quailfence!

(no cool quote - this work is dialogue-less!)

Blurb: An old man plays chess with himself

Why is it worth your time?: It's a fun short film with some very good and expressive animation, especially for the time. The two Geris have very distinct personalities and expressions, and it's vaguely implied that the two don't share memories, so it's very easy to interpret as plural.

Plural/1+ Tags: abuse: not mentioned, type: switching

Content Warnings: contain spoilers, see comments

Accessibility Notes: Available for streaming on Disney+; Wikipedia says that it was released on DVD and VHS alongside A Bug's Life and I'm willing to bet that there's some compilation DVD of Pixar shorts that has it as well. Various bootleg copies on YouTube, here's the one I watched. Audio description might be available on the Disney+ version but I can't confirm atm
Monday, October 12th, 2026 05:59 pm
gonna archive some more post threads on here.
Monday, October 12th, 2026 09:31 pm

Whenever I get asked what kind of work I do, I kinda dread answering because I work in policy.

I love it, but most people don't really know what it is, or maybe they have a feeling that it's something boring or abstract or remote from their lives.

I'm met with a lot of "Oh..." and similar reactions. Real conversation killer.

But in one of those books I now have from the library, Stories Are Weapons, Annalee Newitz has paid my line of work a great compliment (transcribed from the audiobook as I was getting off the bus, so it might not be exact):

I would argue that policy is a type of applied science fiction. Policies are visions of possible futures.

I'm gonna start telling people I work in Applied Science Fiction.

Monday, October 12th, 2026 03:11 pm
"Could it be... could it be that the stories about you witches raising black demons out of mirrors is true? Mages lie, but images..."

Blurb: Jenna and her dark sister Skada, drawn out of a mirror by a rite of women's magic, fight to bring down Kalas's corrupt regime and bring a new king to the throne.

Why is it worth your time?:It's your straightforward epic fantasy of kings and armies, with the twist of the Hames, women-only villages where the practice of drawing out the shadow sister exists. If that's your thing, give it a shot!

Plural/1+ Tags: abuse low-focus, copies (sort of), friendship, family, intimate, plural on purpose, setting-specific,

Content Warnings: Epic fantasy-level violence and war, including that against women and children.

Accessibility Notes: This is the sequel to Sister Light, Sister Dark and you REALLY want to read that first. Available on paper and ebook, and also in the omnibuses The Books of Great Alta and the Great Alta Saga.

Misc. Notes (if any): RIP Jane Yolen. Got nominated for a Nebula.
Sunday, October 11th, 2026 08:37 pm

Last night when I got a notification that one of my library holds was ready for me to borrow, I meant to click "Suspend" (let the next person have it) because I'd just borrowed an audiobook that morning, after hearing its author, who I already know I like, interviewed on a podcast I love, in such an appealing way that I immediately looked up their new book and (scandalously but luckily for me) in the library and it was available to borrow right away!

But instead of "Suspend" I clicked "Borrow" which is a bigger button right next to it. Par for the course, in the kind of day I was having yesterday! At that point, if I returned it I'd have to place a hold on it again and go to the back of whatever queue there was for it. Which really annoyed me. So I stubbornly decided I'd now read two books in the alloted three weeks (when one is normally a struggle; the previous one I'd had was whisked away back to the library when I was on 87%...).

And this new one is twenty-eight hours long. (For reference, 7-8 hours feels like a "normal" book to me. A really luxurious (or intimidating one) might be as high as mid-teens.)

Perhaps fittingly, the new one is called Wagnerism, as in Richard Wagner, known (among other things) for very long operas. I also happened to have found out about this from an episode of another podcast which interviewed its author. (I do find books by other means, I swear; what a funny coincidence this is.)

Alex Ross I already know because his famous book The Rest is Noise is one of those weird comfort-reads I have -- not least because I'm lucky enough to have the audiobook, which is expertly read by one of my favorite narrators, Grover Gardner. (Other favorites of mine are Scott Brick and Adams Morgan.) I so associate Gardner's voice with The Rest is Noise that I was, goofily, almost-surprised to hear Alex Ross interviewed and find out that he sounds different (even though I've always known of course that it's not Ross reading the book; the audio version tells you who's narrating it!).

The Rest is Noise is about "classical music," western art music, in the 20th century, and like I say I love it. The one thing I wish it had was an accompanying playlist -- I am sure there's versions on YouTube and Spotify and others... yes, now that I google it I see that, but that's not quite what I mean -- that YouTube one, for example, has 28 tracks "unavailable" and the rest are ordered by something other than how they appear in the book (which is roughly chronological so it's not like it should be that difficult or unreasonable to present them in that order). And often, particular aspects of a piece are discussed and it'd be great to be able to hear that bit after you'd read the description of it.

So after years, decades maybe, of thinking this, I am really enjoying that Wagnerism does occasionally have that. Not least because I know next to nothing about Wagner beyond "antisemite" and "loved by Hitler," which while big themes of the book are also helped by knowing the broad brushstrokes of the Ring Cycle and various aspects of the music which make it so important long after Wagner, despite the firm association with Nazism.

Otherwise all I had was the half-remembered delight of watching Anna Russell tell the story of The Ring of the Nibelung in an "intro to music" class I took twenty-five years ago, and listening to the first two parts of In Bed With the Right's Wagner series, though from that all I really remembered was the Das Rheingold bit (which is like the first day of a cricket test match)...

The one downside of having snippets of orchestral music in the book is that it's limiting me to not wanting to listen faster than 1.5x... I can often manage 1.75x or so, which can make for a significant difference in a 28-hour long book, but the music already sounds a little bit strange because it's sped up too!

Saturday, October 10th, 2026 07:39 pm
Until 15 minutes ago, I had never heard the name "Lotka–Volterra equations", even though the model showed up in one of my high school science classes, and then again in an internship I did as an engineering undergrad in a department in a field in which the equations are (Wikipedia tells me) particularly important. Surprisingly for this kind of erasure of credit in science, neither Lotka nor Volterra were women.

So I'm curious how widespread this bit of science terminology is. Thus, a poll:

Poll #35160 Pop quiz: the Lotka–Volterra equations
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: Just the Poll Creator, participants: 108

No looking the answer up! Have you heard of "the Lotka–Volterra equations" (or "the Lotka–Volterra model") by name?

Yes, and if I ever somehow forget what they are, I can refer to the handy tattoo I got of them on an easily examined part of my body.
0 (0.0%)

Yes, I know the equations off the top of my head.
2 (1.9%)

Yes, I know what they are and are for, even if I don't immediately recall how the specific equations go.
6 (5.6%)

Maaaaaaaybe? I think so but would have to look it up to be sure.
5 (4.6%)

No, never heard of them.
76 (70.4%)

I cheated and looked them up, and I absolutely knew about those, but I had never knew they had a name.
16 (14.8%)

I cheated and looked them up, and I recognize the equations mathematically, but I never knew they had a name or that they had that practical application.
2 (1.9%)

I cheated and looked them up, and I thought I knew what they were, but I was wrong, I was confusing them with something else.
0 (0.0%)

Other, I will explain in the comments
1 (0.9%)