packbat (
packbat
) wrote
2008
-
03
-
19
10:02 pm
Current Mood:
bouncy but still going to bed
Current Location:
home\west_bedroom\west_table
Current Music:
Not the Doctor - Alanis Morissette
Entry tags:
games
,
polls
,
questions
LJ Anthropology #Whatever
Because the question is too pressing to be left unasked.
[
Poll #1157201
]
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
let's go from three to five
(Anonymous)
2008-03-21 03:06 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
okay- if you were going to add two more 'weapons' to this game, beyond rock, paper, and scissors, what would they be?
remember that they have to either win or lose against each of the other items, and their must be an equal number of wins/losses per weapon.
There would also have to be hand signs for both of the new objects.
rock, paper, scissors, ... , and ... !
I think I might have seen a web site about this last year.
Re: let's go from three to five
packbat.livejournal.com
2008-03-22 12:53 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Well, the way I see it, rock-paper-scissors has two important features:
If you guess your opponent's weapon, you win.
If your opponent plays a purely random strategy, you win as often as you lose regardless of what you do.
If we want to preserve those things, I think we would have to add
three
weapons. Dunno what they would be yet.
19 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
let's go from three to five
(Anonymous) 2008-03-21 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)remember that they have to either win or lose against each of the other items, and their must be an equal number of wins/losses per weapon.
There would also have to be hand signs for both of the new objects.
rock, paper, scissors, ... , and ... !
I think I might have seen a web site about this last year.
Re: let's go from three to five
If we want to preserve those things, I think we would have to add three weapons. Dunno what they would be yet.