Tweets for Today

[packbat]

• 16:20 I just realized: if you care about X, X equals A plus B, and you know A and not B, then *you need to figure out B*. I are smrt! XD #
• 21:33 ...what on earth is a "collectible RTS"? Facebook had an ad for something called "Saga" with that phrase in it. #
• 22:37 nts: the transmission "theory" of consciousness predicts consciousness of before brain patterns of decisions. Experiments show the opposite. #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter

Comments

[toya121.livejournal.com]

I have a question...

[packbat.livejournal.com]

I'll try to answer, if I can...

(...if it's about replying to your PMs, I'm sorry - I've been meaning to reply, but it always seems like it's 10:30 at night when I think of it and I have to get up at 6:30 in the morning. I'll try to do better!)

[bourgeoisify.livejournal.com]

um, I thought that was known? I'm not good at math, so...

you can has be smar.

[packbat.livejournal.com]

No, I think I just explained it badly. What I meant was something like: if I'm trying to evaluate the cost of buying a particular car (X) and I know the sticker price (A) but not its gasoline mileage (which I use to get B), then I don't have enough information. I only mentioned it because I've noticed I tend to stop with A rather than try to get a value for B.