February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
packbat: A headshot of an anthro bat-eared fox - large ears, tan fur, brown dreadlocks - with a shiny textured face visor curving down from zir forehead to a rounded snout. The visor is mostly black, but has large orange-brown ovals on its surface representing zir eyes. (batfox visor)
Saturday, June 20th, 2020 08:33 pm

I don't know how literally they meant it, but in the time we've been active on the fediverse, we've seen a lot of people talking negatively about irony and trying to speak out in favor of being sincere, and ... well, we take things literally. It's literally a thing we do. And taking literally this push to be sincere, genuine, and unaffected has been...

...I think "transformative" makes it sound bigger than it is.

But it's not been as simple as flipping a switch, making a choice. It's been a learning process, or an unlearning process.

What we're noticing - what we're noticing now, anyway - is that we have more work to do. We wrote a reply just now that could have said, "It sounds like they're making some ... assumptions", and that would have been funny, but it also would have been a way to avoid having to explain why we thought those assumptions were troubling. It's not a huge change going from that to "It sounds like they're making some expansive assumptions", but it changed the remark from a vague expression of negativity at a group of people to specifically naming a problem we see in how that group of people have gone about their business.

It was less cruel, looking it over. Less cutting. Instead of saying they're bad, it says that they messed up and it says how and it points in the direction of them doing something about it. Wanting to be sincere led to us being kinder - not necessarily less negative (honestly, I think the scale of what that word implies makes it more so), but less brutal.

Wanting to be sincere has also forced us to recognize negative self-talk and respond to that instead of vaguely self-deprecating. I ... don't remember an example of that, though.

I don't know. It's a process. We think it's been worth going through.

packbat: A bat wearing a big asexual-flag (black-gray-white-purple) backpack. (Default)
Wednesday, June 3rd, 2020 11:27 am

We've been kinda aware for a while that we will sometimes encounter a thing and want to talk about it with a specific online friend group. Like, "huh - we'd want to CW this if we posted it on fedi, and it feels a little too blunt for the friend of ours on IRC, but it might be appreciated by the folx on this Discord server! Probably not that other Discord group DM we're in, though."

...but in this particular case, that particular Discord has a dedicated channel for politics talk and it obviously belongs in that channel - and we have that channel muted, because the conversations happening there drive our stress through the roof. And we don't really want to drive-by with it.

Anyway, have a comic about living in Seattle during the present police riots.

packbat: A selfie shot of a light-skinned black plural system from above, with grass behind zir. (from above)
Sunday, May 31st, 2020 04:00 pm

When we make a post on the fediverse, or when we made a post on Tumblr or Twitter during our time using those platforms, it was extremely easy for people to give us an indication that they were glad we posted it. All three of those broadcast-based social networks have at least one button that lets the originator of the post know that their post was seen, with no further steps required.

That's not true here. As far as I can tell, the only way that anyone here gets direct, in-their-inbox feedback is if someone hits that third button from those other networks and types a reply.

Typing is work. You gotta have something to say, and you gotta get past the inherent anxiety involved in any attempt to put your ideas out there for other people to see and judge. We Packbats don't expect comments or replies - those things are rare.

...and that means this platform is very quiet. Yes, there are only fourteen accounts signed up to get our posts on their reading pages, but this platform is also just quiet - it doesn't generate a stream of acknowledgements the way other platforms do.

(And the fediverse is quieter than Twitter or Tumblr - you don't get notifications for people clicking buttons on posts you didn't originate. Only one account's page sees the viral post blow up.)

Quiet is not a bad thing. But it's something we have to calibrate our expectations to.

- 🐲 🦊

packbat: An anthro furry with tan fur and brown curly hair, turning into dreadlocks down zir back. Ze is wearing sunglasses and a bright red shirt. (batfox sona)
Wednesday, December 19th, 2018 11:16 am

I've seen a number of people on Mastodon bemoan the patterns that show up with broadcast-style social media networks (e.g. Twitter, Tumblr, Mastodon, Dreamwidth) and either waxing poetic about Web 1.0* forums or actively promoting their own. There's also the popularity of Discord servers as places for [description of a group of people] to congregate.

...while I was thinking about these things, though, I realized there's a big advantage that broadcast social networks (and IMs and DMs, for that matter) have over membership-based social networks like forums and chatrooms (and Minecraft servers, for that matter): in membership-based groups, you basically have a package deal when it comes to who you connect to.

It's an advantage as well, of course - I've met some truly wonderful people because they were part of a group I became a part of - but I can't help think of the Five Geek Social Fallacies, of the people in groups I participate in who just constantly rub me the wrong way, of the people at risk of losing connection with multiple friends because someone with a vendetta against them joined the group they hang out with these friends in. The group I didn't join because one of the prominent members had just told me that they weren't okay with being followed by an atheist like me on social media.

Going from broadcast social networks to membership ones is not an unambiguous Better™, is what I'm saying.


* There's some dispute about what "Web 1.0" means, but if the image that came to mind when you read the phrase is "phpBB and similar", it's pretty accurate.